LIMITATIONS
The survey was designed primarily to estimate breeding population
size of mallards, black ducks, wood ducks, and Canada geese. Breeding
population estimates for other species encountered during this survey
frequently have unacceptably large standard errors.
Estimates most appropriate at the survey-area (11-state) level.
Appropriateness and precision decrease as the spatial scale becomes finer,
from stratum-level to state-level to stratum-within-state-level estimates.
The survey protocol uses criteria derived in the mid-continent to
determine the number of indicated pairs and total indicated birds from count
data. The applicability of these criteria to eastern waterfowl populations
have not been evaluated.
Correction factors have been suggested for population estimates derived
from this survey (Heusmann and Sauer, 1997, 2000). These include a
time-of-day correction, especially useful in wood duck and mallard
estimates. A correction for aggregations at feeding sites is applicable for
mallard estimates. Estimates presented here are uncorrected for time-of-day
and feeding-site effects. Although estimates provided are useful in
examining population trends or relative changes in populations, they should
not be considered absolute measures of abundance, especially for mallards
and wood ducks.
POINT OF CONTACT
Anthony Roberts
Wildlife Biologist, Atlantic Flyway US Fish and Wildlife Service
11510 American Holly Drive, Room 212
Laurel, MD 20708-4038, USA
voice mail: (301) 497-5852
fax: (301) 497-5885
anthony_roberts@fws.gov
LITERATURE
CITED
Heusmann, H. W. and
J. R. Sauer. 1997. A survey for mallard pairs in the Atlantic Flyway.
Journal of Wildlife Management 61:1191-1198.
Heusmann, H. W. and
J. R. Sauer. 2000. The northeast states’ breeding waterfowl population
survey. Wildlife Society Bulletin 28:355-364.
PURPOSE
Prior to 1989 no
regional survey existed of waterfowl breeding populations in the northeast
United States. In 1989, the Atlantic Flyway Technical Section initiated this
breeding waterfowl survey in 11 northeast states ranging from New Hampshire
to Virginia. The purpose of this survey was to collect breeding population
abundance data that would support effective management of eastern waterfowl
breeding populations. Prior to this survey (and Federal breeding waterfowl
surveys initiated in 1990 in eastern Canada and Maine) eastern waterfowl
populations were managed based on data collected for mid-continent
populations. This survey was designed primarily to estimate population sizes
of mallards (Anas platyrhynchos platyrhynchos), black ducks (Anas
rubripes), wood ducks (Aix sponsa), and Canada geese (Branta
canadensis), however all observed waterfowl are recorded.
PROCEDURES
During this survey, approximately 1,500 1-km2 plots are surveyed each
spring by biologists from participating states. The survey plots are
randomly allocated among nearly 20 physiographic strata. Prior to 1993
certain plots were checked annually, while others were reselected each
year. In 1993, all plot locations were fixed and plots were surveyed every
year. In addition to recording waterfowl observations on each plot, the
time of day (twilight or daylight) that each plot is surveyed is recorded.
Analyses of survey data indicate that the time of day that a plot is
surveyed can significantly affect detection probability. Since 1993, survey
participants have been instructed to survey plots consistently during the
twilight or daylight periods from year to year. Sample plots are surveyed
in most cases from the ground by either automobile, boat, or on foot.
From 1993 until 2002, only total birds were counted for green-wing teal
(Anas crecca), blue-wing teal (A. discors), gadwall (A. strepera), common
mergansers (Mergus merganser), hooded mergansers (Lophodytes cucullatus),
and mute swans (Cygnus olor). Beginning in 2003, more detailed data were
collected for these species, as is done for mallards, black ducks, wood
ducks, and Canada geese.
Also in 2003, the formula for calculating total indicated birds (TIB)
for Canada geese was changed. Previously, TIBs for Canada geese were
calculated as (2 × pairs) + singles + grouped birds. In order to have
population estimates more comparable to those from other goose surveys and
estimates for other species in this survey, the formula was changed to:
TIB = 2 × (pairs + singles) + grouped birds. As raw data are not currently
available to recalculate TIBs for Canada geese for the previous years,
population estimates based on both formulae will be presented for at least
5 years to allow comparison. The Division of Migratory Bird Management, USFWS, is responsible for
performing data analyses.
More detailed information
about survey procedures or analyses of these data can be found in
Heusmann and Sauer (1997, 2000).
STATES PARTICIPATING
IN THE SURVEY |
Vermont New Hampshire
Massachusetts
Rhode Island |
Connecticut New York
Pennsylvania
New Jersey
| Delaware Maryland
Virginia |
DATABASES
Two databases for this survey can be accessed online through the FWS/USGS
Migratory Bird Data Center. A count database is available that contains
raw waterfowl counts at the sample plot-level. A second database of population
estimates is available that contains species-specific, annual population
estimates for physiographic strata and state units.
DOWNLOADABLE
FIELDS DEFINITION
Field
Name |
Field
Definition |
Plot-level
Count Database |
|
Year |
Survey
year |
State |
State
in which sample plot is contained |
Stratum |
Physiographic
stratum in which plot is contained (Heusmann
and Sauer 1997) |
Plot |
Plot
number |
Date |
Calendar
date on which plot was surveyed |
Method |
Vehicle
used for survey (G: Ground, B: Boat, F: Fixed-wing, H: Helicopter) |
CkType |
Time
of sampling (1: Mid-day, 2: Twilight, 3: Not sampled – no wetland
habitat) |
WetHab |
Indicator
of presence of wetland habitat on sample plot (Y: yes, N: no) |
HandFd |
Indicator
of the presence of artificial feeding sites on sample plot (Y: yes,
N: no) |
MALL_TIP |
Mallard
total indicated pairs |
MALL_TIB |
Mallard
total indicated birds |
ABDU_TIP
|
American
black duck total indicated pairs |
ABDU_TIB |
American
black duck total indicated birds |
WODU_TIP |
Wood
duck total indicated pairs |
WODU_TIB |
Wood
duck total indicated birds |
GADW_TIP |
Gadwall
total indicated pairs |
GADW_TIB |
Gadwall
total indicated birds |
CAGO_TIP |
Canada
goose total indicated pairs |
CAGO_TIB |
Canada
goose total indicated birds |
BWTE_TIP |
Blue-winged
teal total indicated pairs |
BWTE_
TIB |
Blue-winged
teal total indicated birds |
AGWT_TIP |
Green-winged
teal total indicated pairs |
AGWT_TIB |
Green-winged
teal total indicated birds |
HOME_
TIP |
Hooded
merganser total indicated pairs |
HOME_TIB |
Hooded
merganser total indicated birds |
COME_TIP |
Common
merganser total indicated pairs |
COME_TIB |
Common
merganser total indicated birds |
MUSW_TIP |
Mute
swan total indicated pairs |
MUSW_TIB |
Mute
swan total indicated birds |
OTHERTOT |
Total
counts of other waterfowl species not listed above |
TOTDUCKS |
Total
estimated birds for all selected duck species |
|
|
Estimates
Database |
|
Year |
Survey
year |
State |
State
code |
Stratum |
Physiographic
strata code (Heusmann and Sauer 1997) |
Species |
Four
letter alphabetic code for a species (MALL: mallard, ABDU: American
black duck, WODU: wood duck, GADW: gadwall, CAGO: Canada goose,
BWTE: blue-winged teal, AGWT: green-winged teal, HOME: hooded merganser,
COME: common merganser, MUSW: mute swan) |
No_plots |
Number
of plots used in estimation |
EST_TIP |
Total
estimated pairs |
SE_TIP |
Standard
error of total indicated pairs estimate |
EST_TIB |
Total
estimated birds, based on the old (1993-2002)TIB formula |
SE_TIB |
Standard
error of total indicated birds estimate, basedon the old
(1993-2002) TIB formula |
EST_TIBN |
Total estimated
birds, based on the new (2003 and later) TIB formula |
SE_TIBN |
Standard error of
total indicated birds estimate, based on the new (2003 and later) TIB
formula |
Return
to Atlantic Flyway Breeding Waterfowl Survey
|